14-day Agent Action Proof Pilot

Control one high-risk agent action. Prove every decision.

In 14 days, Inntris instruments one AI agent workflow with pre-execution policy enforcement and verifiable receipts for every allowed and blocked action.

Find your pilot workflow Inspect a live receipt

Design-partner pilots start at $5,000. One workflow, fixed scope, production rollout recommendation included.

The pilot path

Enforce first. Authorize clearly. Prove afterward.

Days 1-2

Choose the action

Map one risky production workflow, its execution boundary, and the team that owns the consequence.

Days 3-7

Enforce the policy

Put Inntris in the decision path, bind the agent identity, and configure clear allow and block conditions.

Days 8-14

Prove the outcome

Run real scenarios, verify receipts independently, and deliver the production rollout recommendation.

A real control boundary

The agent must receive a PASS decision before the protected action executes.

A policy your team owns

The pilot makes the allow, block, identity, and limit conditions explicit.

Evidence others can verify

Every decision produces a receipt that can be inspected without trusting a screenshot or mutable log.

Pilot qualification

Find the action worth protecting first.

Select what is true today. Inntris will recommend the highest-value workflow for a focused pilot.

Do your agents call external tools or APIs?

Creates execution risk outside the model boundary.

Can agents access or export sensitive customer data?

Creates privacy, access-control, and incident-response exposure.

Can agents change production code or infrastructure?

Creates operational and change-control risk.

Can agents trigger payments, refunds, or spend?

Creates direct financial loss and authorization risk.

Can agents message customers, partners, or employees?

Creates reputational and communication-policy risk.

Would you struggle to prove who authorized an action?

Signals an accountability and governance gap.

Would you struggle to prove the logs were not changed?

Signals an audit-evidence and repudiation gap.

Is a security review slowing or blocking production rollout?

Signals an active, budgeted deployment problem.